Analysis and recommendations

SPICED Analysis

Prepare the conversation without inventing the story

Queast organizes supported account context into Situation, Pain, Impact, Critical Event, and Decision preparation. It does not complete discovery, score qualification, or issue an automated verdict.

Inspectable inputSupported account evidenceFacts, dates, context and uncertainty
Preparation outputHypotheses, gaps and questionsNo score. No qualification verdict.
Human judgmentSeller-led discoveryValidate, update and decide

Five preparation areas

Prepare each area without forcing an answer

Each heading organizes supported account context and the questions that remain. Missing evidence stays visible instead of being filled with confident language.

S

Situation

Supported facts, current activity, hiring patterns, technologies, and visible movement around the company.

P

Pain

A pressure or friction hypothesis supported by repeated or sufficiently strong evidence—not an isolated observation.

I

Impact

A cautious view of why the pressure may matter, without invented ROI, cost, or performance figures.

CE

Critical Event

Current timing evidence or a clearly marked gap when no defensible why-now context exists.

D

Decision

Plausible roles, entry points, and questions—not a definitive buying committee or decision authority claim.

Keep authority visible

Separate evidence, analysis, preparation, and discovery

SPICED is a preparation output. It does not turn source data into a qualification score or replace a separate Actionable Signal recommendation.

  1. 01

    Source evidence

    Dated job-market, company, people, news, social, and technology observations remain inspectable.

  2. 02

    Analysis

    Related evidence is interpreted across time while uncertainty and conflicts remain visible.

  3. 03

    SPICED preparation

    Supported context becomes hypotheses, gaps, and questions for the seller to review.

  4. 04

    Human discovery

    The seller validates each area in conversation and keeps control of qualification judgment.

Evidence-gated preparation

Show support and gaps honestly

The preparation view should advance only as reliable, current support improves. A more complete view still does not mean discovery is complete or the account is qualified.

Not shown

Held

Do not show a SPICED view when reliable account evidence is too thin.

Incomplete

Preview

Show useful supported areas while timing, decision context, or other sections remain visibly incomplete.

Supported

Prepared view

Show all five areas when each has support, while preserving hypotheses and unanswered questions.

Prepared is not qualified. Every view remains a starting point for human discovery.

Preparation in the workflow

Keep SPICED beside the current action

The current Workbench exposes a SPICED entry point beside the seller's active step and company context. The visible control supports access to preparation; it does not prove that the account is qualified.

See Daily Workbench
Dark Queast Workbench showing the selected step, company information control, and SPICED entry point in the side panel
Product evidence: the selected Workbench step exposes company context and a SPICED entry point.

Preparation boundaries

Never fill in what the seller still needs to learn

Missing evidence stays a gap or a discovery question. SPICED should not create certainty that the account evidence cannot support.

  • No admitted pain

    Do not turn an isolated observation into a problem the buyer has acknowledged.

  • No invented impact

    Do not add quantified cost, ROI, or performance claims without approved evidence.

  • No manufactured urgency

    Do not create a Critical Event when timing evidence is absent.

  • No definitive committee

    Do not present visible roles as confirmed decision authority.

  • No qualification verdict

    Do not label the account qualified or discovery complete.

Seller-ready output

Lead with the questions that move discovery forward

The seller should be able to review the supported angle, the likely starting point, and the gaps that still need validation before choosing the next action.

Why might now matter?

The current timing evidence and what remains uncertain.

What could open the conversation?

A supported account angle framed as a hypothesis, not an admitted pain.

Where should research start?

A plausible visible role or entry point, not a confirmed decision-maker.

What supports this view?

The evidence, dates, assumptions, and gaps the seller can inspect.

Next step

Carry the supported angle into human-controlled work

Use SPICED preparation to review the account in Workbench or draft a message that the seller controls, edits, and decides whether to use.